Sauron, Jadis, and the Aesthetic of Evil

73

By satomko

Jadis, the White Witch. Art by Leo and Diane Dillon.
See all 2 photos
Jadis, the White Witch. Art by Leo and Diane Dillon.

What Tolkien and Lewis Have to Say on the Beauty of Wickedness

To both authors evil is a corrupting and destructive force, though Lewis argues for evil as seductive while Tolkien claims evil to be repugnant and coercive.

The goals of the antagonists are the same for both authors: the annihilation of everything he or she cannot control. The means to this end, however, are different in the worlds of Narnia and Middle Earth. Jadis reverts to violence only when her charm cannot achieve her desired results. Sauron, however, has no beauty, so deception and conquest are his primary tools.

The White Witch

Jadis is a queen of Charn, a world she killed while vying for the throne with her sister. In The Magician’s Nephew she says she uses the deplorable word—a word that extinguishes all life—only as last recourse. Despite her selfishness and nihilism her fierce beauty clouds the minds of Digory, Uncle Andrew, and in The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, Edmund. She charms men into servitude which suggests evil is beguiling and something people accept because it appears attractive and noble.

The Eye of Sauron as seen in the Lord of the Rings.
The Eye of Sauron as seen in the Lord of the Rings.
The Lord of the Rings: 50th Anniversary, One Vol. Edition
Amazon Price: $11.32
List Price: $20.00

The Eye of Mordor

The Silmarillion says that Sauron because of his treachery “could never again appear fair to the eyes of Men” (280). People are not seduced into his service by beauty since he has none; they follow him because they believe in the lie of Sauron’s omniscience and omnipotence. Sauroman, despairing of victory, joins his enemy, betraying the White Council. Boromir believes there is no hope against an immortal foe and attempts taking the Ring for himself. Denethor sees what Sauron wants him to see which inspires the Steward’s suicidal mania. In each instance Sauron succeeds by threats and deception rather than seduction.

The One Ring, as an extension of Sauron, operates the same way. It is not a beautiful piece of jewelry just as its maker is not beautiful. The Ring makes its wearer into a slave by offering the wearer exactly what he or she wants. Through these desires, though, it turns all intentions to evil. Bilbo, for instance, has trouble letting go of the Ring though he is not an evil hobbit. As with Sauron, the Ring and its deception need not be beautiful to make people into desperate slaves.

Kingdoms of the Wicked

Despite the different roads the ending destination is the same. Jadis destroys one great empire, and her other is a static, frozen world without happiness. Mordor, similarly, is a blasted wasteland with nothing green or growing within miles of either Barad-dur or the volcanic Mount Doom. Evil disfigures the world around it. Isengard becomes such a blight the Ents are mobilized to take vengeance for the deforestation, and the Shire, too, suffers under filth and smoking gloom when it falls into evil hands.

Unlike in Narnia, where Aslan’s breath restores the life of the land and people in it, Middle Earth suffers with its scars. For instance, Galadriel’s magic can make a special mallorn tree grow in the Shire, she cannot replace or repair the old Party Tree that was cut down just as the dead cannot be restored to life.

Rewards of Sin

In their fantasy novels Tolkien and Lewis show the different paths evil may take. For Tolkien evil has its own lies but beauty and seduction are not among them, while Lewis contends that evil can have a pretty face to use to its advantage. No matter how divergent those paths, though, the results are always the same: oppression and ruination.

Sources

Lewis, C. S. The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe. The Chronicles of Narnia. New York: Harper Collins, 2001. 107-198.

Lewis, C. S. The Magician’s Nephew. The Chronicles of Narnia. New York: Harper Collins, 2001. 7-106.

Tolkien, J. R. R. The Lord of the Rings. Boston: Mariner Books, 2005

Tolkien, J. R. R. The Silmarillion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1977.

Comments

Obstreperous profile image

Obstreperous 23 months ago

I am probably the only person in America that still has not seen any of the Lord of the Rings films, or read the books. However, I am a huge Lewis fan. Great hub.

satomko profile image

satomko Hub Author 23 months ago

I'm glad you enjoyed my hub regardless of your unfamiliarity with Tolkien's work.

tracykarl99 profile image

tracykarl99 Level 1 Commenter 23 months ago

I read Lord of the Rings as a kid and loved it. I saw the movie too. Much of what you have written about here sounds like it comes from the Greek myths ~ very mysterious and mind expanding stuff!

satomko profile image

satomko Hub Author 23 months ago

Thank you, tracykarl99. I'm glad you like it, and I appreciate your comments.

valeriebelew profile image

valeriebelew Level 2 Commenter 23 months ago

Interesting hub. I feel like I want to discuss evil, rather than say some hum drum thing about your hub being well written, which of course, it was. I am on the side of those who believe evil is seductive. If not, who would be willing to possibly pay the price. Some evil may not be seductive, but I am having difficulty imagining evil that is not related to somebody's pleasure, even though it may not be something most of us would be tempted to do. Anyway good hub. I'm rating it up. (: v

satomko profile image

satomko Hub Author 23 months ago

I'm glad you stopped by and gave your comments, valeriebelew. It is always good to hear from you.

James A Watkins profile image

James A Watkins Level 8 Commenter 23 months ago

Excellent analysis, my friend. These are two of my favorite writers. I enjoyed your work here. Well done!

satomko profile image

satomko Hub Author 23 months ago

Thank you, James. Your comments and insights are always welcome.

BumptiousQ profile image

BumptiousQ 22 months ago

Fascinating, Sat. Well done.

I first read 'The Chronicles of Narnia' and 'Lord of the Rings' right around the same time, when I was about 14 years old, which happened to coincide with the Fall of Saigon in the mid-70's. Narnia really didn't do it for me back then. On the other hand, the epic scope of 'Lord of the Rings' resonated with the times for me, because I had been weaned on the Vietnam War, the Cold War, and the upheaval of the Civil Rights Movement.

My childhood was a world dominated by the Vietnam War and the Cold War, a world peopled by parents and grandparents who had fought in World War II and the Korean "Conflict." Lewis's Narnia seemed a tad too quaint at the time. Tolkien's work struck a very strong chord with my generation, one Lewis's Narnia couldn't hope to match...

satomko profile image

satomko Hub Author 22 months ago

I'm glad you stopped by to comment, BumptiousQ. I think many readers would agree with you that Tolkien's work seems to present a more fully realized world with serious themes and consequences for the characters.

BumptiousQ profile image

BumptiousQ 22 months ago

Incidentally, not long ago my 13-year-old daughter, Alicia, decided she wanted to check out the "Lord of the Rings" movies. She'd been a bit leery of 'em in the past -- thought they would freak her out. She loved the films, and now is just about finished reading "Fellowship."

We share a favorite character: Samwise. I told her "great minds think alike."

satomko profile image

satomko Hub Author 22 months ago

Good news, BumptiousQ; thanks for sharing.

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working